Capabilities guide
What we can print, what quality to expect, and how to design for the best result.
This page is written for two kinds of buyers: people who just want the quick answer, and engineers or designers who want the deeper design rules. Start with the quick snapshot if you only need the basics, then scroll down into tolerances, finish expectations, and part-design guidance if you want to optimize a part for additive manufacturing.
Quick snapshot
What customers usually want to know first
Size and envelope
Current part-size capability
Our current service is built around a maximum single-part envelope of 220 x 220 x 250 mm (8.66 x 8.66 x 9.84 in). If your model is close to the limit, keep in mind that orientation matters. A part may fit in one orientation and not in another.
- Smaller parts usually quote faster, print more consistently, and ship more economically.
- Tall, thin parts can be printable but may need more conservative geometry to avoid wobble or layer shift risk.
- If a part is oversized, it can often be redesigned into multiple interlocking or fastened sections.
Tolerance and fit
What sort of tolerance you should expect
For general FDM service work, a realistic expectation is ±0.25 mm (±0.010 in) on many dimensions, with looser variation on larger parts, long flat spans, thin walls, and features sensitive to cooling or shrink behavior.
- Press fits, bearing pockets, sliding fits, and gasket surfaces should be designed with testing and adjustment in mind.
- Critical fit features often benefit from a small amount of post-processing or a printed test coupon first.
- If a dimension is truly critical, call it out early so the design can be reviewed before production.
Finish quality
What the printed finish looks like
Our standard service is tuned for strong, clean, functional parts rather than cosmetic showroom perfection. Expect visible layer lines, especially on curved surfaces, shallow angles, and large radiused faces.
- Vertical walls usually present the cleanest visual finish.
- Carbon-fiber-filled materials typically look more matte and hide layer lines a bit better than standard materials.
- Top surfaces, hole walls, underside overhangs, and unsupported bridges are the areas most likely to show process texture.
Technical specs
Current service profile
| Specification | Current service |
|---|---|
| Default service profile | 0.24 mm layers / 0.0094 in |
| Nozzle diameter | 0.6 mm / 0.024 in |
| Recommended minimum wall | 1.2 mm / 0.047 in |
| Recommended robust wall | 1.8 to 2.4 mm / 0.071 to 0.094 in |
| Recommended clearance for moving/sliding fit | 0.3 to 0.5 mm / 0.012 to 0.020 in |
| Recommended clearance for easy assembly | 0.2 to 0.3 mm / 0.008 to 0.012 in |
| Minimum embossed/debossed detail | 0.6 to 0.8 mm / 0.024 to 0.031 in |
| Safer text height/depth | 1.0 mm+ / 0.040 in+ |
| Unsupported bridge guidance | Keep short whenever possible; test if appearance matters |
| Overhang guidance | Gentler angles produce cleaner undersides |
Design guidance
Design principles for strong, printable parts
Strengths
Where 3D printing shines
- Fast turnaround without tooling
- Low cost for one-offs and short runs
- Excellent for complex geometry and internal features
- Easy to iterate between revisions
- Great for fixtures, brackets, enclosures, jigs, prototypes, and custom adapters
Tradeoffs
What to account for in the design
- Not ideal for mirror-smooth cosmetic surfaces straight off the printer
- Dimensional accuracy is good but not the same as precision machining
- Layer-based process means strength depends on orientation
- Large, thin, and heat-sensitive geometry can distort more than simple compact parts
- Some features still benefit from drilling, reaming, tapping, sanding, or inserts after printing
Beginner takeaway
If you only read one section, read this
- If you are unsure, start with PLA for indoor parts and PETG for tougher everyday functional parts.
- For the cleanest-looking result, avoid giant flat surfaces, razor-thin walls, and tiny cosmetic text.
- If a hole, slot, or mating feature matters, give it deliberate clearance instead of exact nominal CAD size.
- If a part needs to handle repeated stress, impacts, or high heat, say so early so the design can be reviewed around that need.